<aside>

What do you think of Go-NoGo vs Community Aviation? Are they two different brands that are competing? Does Go-NoGo essentially become part of Community Aviation? Do we rename Community Aviation to Go-NoGo? How do these two products, if they are two distinct products, get along without confusing consumers?

</aside>

This is the right question at the right time. Let me think through this clearly.

The Current Situation

Community Aviation — The brand. The company. "Training for Life." Experts, centers, community, Learn-Do-Fly methodology. Been around for years. Known in the industry.

Go-NoGo — The AI flight planning tool. The "hook" product. What we've been building as the entry point. Has its own identity, versioning ("Go-NoGo 9.2"), almost feels like a standalone product.

The Tension

If we keep both names prominent, we create confusion:

• "Is Go-NoGo a separate app?"
• "Do I need Community Aviation to use Go-NoGo?"
• "Which one do I sign up for?"
• "Are these competitors?"

Two brands = split attention, split marketing, split identity.

Three Options

Option A: Go-NoGo Becomes a Feature Inside Community Aviation

Community Aviation is the product. Go-NoGo is what happens when you're in FLY mode.

• Brand: Community Aviation
• Tagline: Training for Life